Find a Lawyer

WAZIR versus STATE

Section 302/34 leads to a careful analysis of the prosecution's testimony based on the prosecution's case, ocular testimony, deceased statements, evidence of the circumstances, the recovery of the alleged criminal weapons and the evidence of the motive, and then concludes The witnesses are there. At the time of the announcement of the death, the presence of witnesses to the incident and the prosecution was highly suspicious, with eyewitnesses who witnessed the occasion, and pretended to be present, failing to give a satisfactory account of the presence of the eyewitness. Witnesses testified about the minute's details. Gave the impression that they had scattered the details and repeated them as a parrot in the trial court, only to assume that the witnesses of the incident had not seen the incident. In the presence of eyewitnesses, legal evidence to be clearly presented as false and the trial court denied the evidence given that it was stated that the hatchets recovered from the accused were sent to the Chemical Examiner and At the time of the recovery, the blood stained was told that the recovery counselor was related to the complainant The background to the enmity between the parties and the litigants was the story of the argument that was given by the prosecutor. Is. The charge was not convinced that the deceased had not been formed on the condition of the matter with the complaining party on illicit terms with his wife and had kept the facts on record, the prosecution had failed to prove the case against the accused. The suspect and the suspect were acquitted of any suspicion and acquitted of the accused when you need a advocate from Mardan lawyer