Find a Lawyer

SALIMA KHATOON versus MANZAR HUSSAIN

Civil Procedure Code for CPC Matters Order V and Service of Summon OV, R 17 and O IX, R 9 Rules of Sindh Chief Court, Rr 140 K 141 Former Decree, Except for Plaintiff Applicant The former court has been presented on the basis of. In the case brought against him by the plaintiff's summons, he was not properly served and a copy was affixed to the defendant's house on the outside door, but this was not shown by Belfast's endorsement. It said that the provisions of Rule 17 of the OV were complied with by Belf. The report did not disclose the name and address of the person by whom the defendant's home was identified and in whose presence the copy was affixed, no evidence was available that the defendant avoided receiving the summons held. What was or was denied, the defendant did not have proper summons service. The previous order passed against the defendant was supportive (PP 69 69 2, 3 693, 41 694141 A, F; and C Moinuddin Ahmed. immigration advocates email from Mirpur Khas lawyer