SHER KHAN versus STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 304, Part II and the Collar witnesses have proved from the evidence of the complainant that there is no enmity between the parties and there is no reason for the prosecution witnesses to be involved in the alleged Broadway Light incident where the complaining party Has no reason to replace the culprits with the real culprits. Evidence of the testimony of the complainant and the prosecution is natural, straightforward, and reliable, that it was alleged that he was falsely implicated, saying it was a long distance, evidence of the prosecution's testimony was non-existent. Despite legal scrutiny, they were in no way incompetent and should be relied on safely for the purpose of conviction. The accused had no intention of killing the victim, but it can be stressed that the shootings on the victim's injuries could have led to his death and could have been prevented, the prosecution said under Section 4 under4. , Part II, the offenders of the Penal Code were converted from Secto to Section 302 under Secto n304, Part II Penal Code and their sentence reduced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Mingora lawyer