MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus GENERAL MANAGER PIONEER PAKISTAN SEED LIMITED, LAHORE
Sections 25, 28 (3) (4) and 30 Consumer Protection Claims The consumer purchased the corn badge on 12 12 2007 and used it in June 2008, but this claim was filed on 7 Court 10 2008 by the consumer court. Was presented and the notice was issued by the Consumer Court on 219 2008 and partly allowed the claim filed by the consumer and the company to supply him 250 bags of corn seed whose limit The point of view was provided for filing a claim before the consumer court and, especially in this case in the background, the cause of action when the consumer crop was harvested in the month of June, 2008 Applied to the fan, when the basis of the claim before the consumer court, the user bought 250 bags of corn and used the same 248 bags and used by the user and consequently only gave the entire purchased space. The bag has been challenged by the manufacturer and, without proper seal, was actually filled by the company or after being de-sold by the consumer, they were able to justify this claim to the customer through some bad seeds. In order to show that the user failed to produce any reliable evidence on record to create an opportunity for Because the badges in the company's sealed bags were, in fact, simply poor quality of the customer, it cannot be assumed that the quality of the badge was not because the consumer was not an expert in the relevant field before the consumer court The claim was placed before the consumer was above the court limit. Provided in section 28 of the Punjab Consumer Protection Act 2005, and was not enforceable even in the absence of mandatory notice
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2014
