NISAR AHMAD versus STATE
Sections 2 30 300 and, 300, offer exceptional immunity and sudden provocation were not raised before the trial court, even if the appeal phase is banned and it should be decided before the High Court for verdict. So that the court can come to its conclusion on a re-evaluation of the evidence. If the evidence on record can be held, entertained, and it cannot be neglected whether or not it was raised at trial.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mandi Bahauddin lawyer
