SHER AFZAL versus STATE
The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Section 5 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 161 invalidation of the issue in the currency note numbers of the accused magistrate and the inspector, standing at a distance of 30 40 from the accused magistrate. Not listening to the conversation between. The complainant observer does not know where the fraudulent money was obtained and even the accused magistrate and inspector standing behind the bus in the Anti-Corruption office did not recover the physical possession of the accused simply by referring to the complainant. Dealing with bribery and acting under the Inspector Anti-Corruption Complainant, a magistrate confesses to arresting his brother and thereby complaining against the illegality of the drivers or truck owners. Complaining against the accused on demand is not a reasonable assumption of innocence Or accused, arrested, coup d aykuytl in terms of the conditions shall not be excluded ordered
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Mastoi lawyer