Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUSAF KHAN versus STATE

The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Section 5 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 161 Defining the Evidence Magistrate and an Army officer who was a material witness and supervised the raiding party. The report, which was accepted as controversial evidence, did not examine whether the fraudulent amount was paid by them to pass the examinations, but because there was a divide between the front and the back seats. He who was sitting in the previous seat could not see the matter which caused the difference in the history and the numbers. Counsel was presented on the occasion of transferring the defective amount of currency notes contained in the Investigating Officer, which was neither present at the time of the incident nor witnessing the transaction which witnesses did not hear the conversation. It is found that the witnesses contradicted each other. Documents submitted by the material points to the accused indicated that the complainant had complained again to the accused best advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer