ABDUL MALIK versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Arts 3 and 4 Evidence, the arrest of the accused and the presence of two counselors in his presence, 13 grams of heroin were allegedly recovered from the accused Investigation Officer and the Assistant Maintenance Investigation Officer. There is no clear reason for the alleged witnesses claiming to be picked up from a shop, and then the defense witnesses involved in the case supported the version of the accused and seriously challenged the defendant's evidence for extradition. The evidence of the defense witnesses was presented in a commendable move, so the story of the investigating officer The prosecution cannot be excused from the crime, so it cannot be based on the evidence of the prosecution regarding the defense evidence to determine a particular fact. Defense evidence said the prosecution's evidence was unsafe to prove as a baseless offense. on weakness defense defended
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Mansehra lawyer