MUHAMMAD HAROON REHMANI versus STATE
Sections 420 and 477 of the Banks (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984), Sections 6 and 10, together with fraud and account discovery succeeded in pulling huge sums on a bank employee and causing huge damage to the bank. Delivered and misused Daily sheets by manipulating the aggregate and not debiting the checks received to approve the accounts from which they sent the relevant advice orally and in the presence of witnesses to their crime. Confessed and charged high debts in front of other superiors and others illegally. The prosecution, obtained illegally from the actual domestic effects, has prosecuted the accused and provided much evidence that the accused was clearly charged with the crime. In his judicial confession, the accused disclosed all relevant facts about how he cheated and what he did with the money alleging that his confession was not voluntary d The statement of the magistrate recording confession had removed the confession. The affidavit confirms the receipt from the persons to whom the funds were given by the accused in his investigation, his case against the accused proved beyond doubt and the evidence based on the judgment of conviction was reasonable. Was based on scrutiny. Reasons for arriving at the conclusion reached punishment and punishment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Chowk Maitla lawyer