Find a Lawyer

ZESHAN AKHTAR ZAIDI versus STATE

Through the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 419/109 and 403, interim prosecution failed to provide evidence that the accused was aware of the fact that a principal accused was acting illegally as a P Nevertheless, the accused helped her and mistreated her. Introduced as a P in the bank to defraud the bank and commit fraud, the prosecutor testified that to prove that the national identity card was tampered with and the name and photo changed. Yes, there was no evidence to prove that the accused was also a party to the identity card fraud. The suspect had no idea that AP was not and the national ID card produced by him was a fake and was using a national identity card to travel abroad in the name of AP, which was supposed to be A He had long been impersonating P as long as he was accused. That the P was and that the fact was not falsified by the prosecution did not prove that the prosecution did not prove that the accused knew A as A and not that P was charged again. St. A, who could not stand trial for his fugitives and was subsequently charged with death, was charged under Article 19 && and PPC3, PPC, for the offense. They were not imposed but were sentenced to reduce both offenses, but the prosecution did not present any evidence that the accused had instituted restraint or false accusation of the defendant's plea that he be sent to A.P. Known as and introduced it to the bank list of supreme court advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer