SAMIUDDIN versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article 4 The evidence of the complainant and counselors found in the possession of the accused heroin was straightforward, alleging any serious contradictions in the natural and credible evidence that could have affected its authenticity. I was not accused of any hostility, nor was I charged. For his false allegations, the prosecution proved his case beyond reasonable doubt. The conviction and sentence were retained, however, the accused is entitled to benefit from the provisions of Section 382B, CCPC. Was in jail as a prisoner and after hearing his sentence.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Chunian lawyer