Find a Lawyer

MUHAMRPAD JAMIL KHAN versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Under Constitution Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 23 Constitution Subject Art 23 the owners have the right to dispose of the property. The Border Development Authority refused to change the plot to the applicant that it was allotted for residential purposes but kept for commercial purposes. The change was requested and the application cannot be granted until a policy decision has been taken regarding the misuse of the residential plot for commercial purposes, the applicant says. There is no nexus between the use of plot and the denial of Article 23 of the Constitution. Is missing. When Pakistan has violated the applicant's ownership of property and the right to settle, the applicant committee violates the terms of the lease by plotting the business purpose and authority because a banker said against it. There is a nexus between the denial of the breach. And the use of the plot for commercial use did not bring the applicant any reliable material on record in the same case. In the same case, the Authority had in fact made a change in the name of the buyer during the petitioner, therefore, on this request this relief. It could not be found that Article 23 of the Constitution of Pakistan violated the right to own or dispose of property under Article 23, Constitution of Pakistan. According to the law a right was binding and not uncontrollable or irregular how to become a advocate from Domeli lawyer