Find a Lawyer

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN versus NAJAF ALI SHAH

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 3 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Amendment Jurisdiction, Respondent's practice claimed that the land in dispute was originally granted to his grandfather by the rulers of Sindh and Since then, their possession of this land has remained unaltered. Even though the British conquered and they were the descendants of the original grantee, because of the proprietary and proprietary rights of the land owned by the applicant, the applicant authority denied the defendant's claim on two grounds, Ola, the land located in the cantonment area, was entrusted with the federal government, as the respondent could not claim ownership of it, secondly, that the defendant and his ancestors were government applicants. There were several individuals in the authority, not only to show that any document or notification failed to present that the government had ever made this Was obtained, but from any evidence to prove that the respondents or their ancestors were ever given land on appeal for appeal, after keeping oral and documentary evidence and giving compelling reasons, the court below Concluded that the land in the dispute was originally given to the respondents' ancestors and was owned and owned by them because it was located in the cantonment area. Upon the appellate court's finding on the basis of the evidence on record, the government should not award it in the absence of any evidence of acquisition of the land when the High Court's amending jurisdiction cannot be interfered with when on record. Misinterpretation of facts was not available. famous high court advocate from Sangla Hill lawyer