ABID ALI versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Civil Procedure Code Order XXXIX temporarily employs the railway service as an employee of the Pairing and Interlocutory Orders OXXXIX, Rr 1 and 2 Temporary Order of Petitioner after the retirement of his father to the Quarter Allotment in his name. Had previously been allotted. The said petitioner sought direction from the court and prayed for a stay order which was approved by the trial court, but the Appellate Court Railway later refused to advise that the appellate court orders be withdrawn along with the trial court. And the case should be referred to the trial court for a decision on the application. For the Fur's order, the freshman lawyer acknowledged that this is a suitable case for remand and judgment whose request is appropriate and only if the Appeal Court, along with the trial, is granted and the case is pending with the trial court. The remand for the judgment was again obtained. After the parties have added additional evidence, if they wish
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Chilas lawyer