Find a Lawyer

SULCMAN HAJI MUHAMMAD & CO. versus ABBASI

The plaintiff did some constructive work for the plaintiff to restore the XXIII VII on the CPC Summary Procedure of Negotiable Devices, but the plaintiff withheld the final bill because of the plaintiff. In which a certain amount was added to the bill due to damages to the plaintiff. The defendants allegedly created and because of the alleged aggressive behavior of the plaintiff and the alleged damages, the defendant claims that the work done by the plaintiff was of poor quality and not in the terms of the agreement, by the parties. An examination of the evidence presented shows that the defendant had failed to prove his position. The alleged quality of the work done by the claimant or the work was not performed as directed by him. That the progress of the work was not hampered and delayed because the defendant did not inspect any witnesses to show that the defendant's paranoid behavior was due to a mistake or to an injury. How much the defendant suffered due to the defendant's non-cooperation or objectionable behavior in the agreement. It was shown that the bill was to be paid for the money as the certificate is by the claimant. The final bill was submitted to the architect, after which it was allowed after a small reduction. Was entitled to pay the bill, the decision was final, final and according to the agreement binding the parties according to the suit is the decree best law firms from Mian Walli lawyer