Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus STATE


The police documents of the Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/304 bail have revealed that the accused was prosecuted in such circumstances, indicating that the accused had committed so much abuse. Is that if not under section 302, the penalty would have to fall. The Code, (Cast under Section 304, Code of Conduct), is that if a court considers a matter, it must come to a conclusive conclusion to consider the whole of the material that there is no reasonable basis for believing it. That the accused had committed a non-bailable offense. The completed witnesses were not examined and the statements of the witnesses were pursued under section 161, CRPC and a serious case was filed against the accused. Their case was not coming under section 497 (2), which CCP Bell denied in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Washuk lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.