Find a Lawyer

SYED MAZHAR ALI versus MST. HALIMA BAI

Applicants for the Civil Code 1908 Sections 9 and 115 suit litigation and monetization claim that the respondents continued their possession of the License Trial Court, affecting the examination of evidence, oral and documented documents, The applicant will arrive at this conclusion. Failure to prove that he owns the quarters or is occupied by the defendants The respondents seized the question number long before it was allotted to the applicant through the applicant's society suit. It was sent by the trial court as well as the first appellate court which found that the applicant was. The suit is not entitled to the vacant possession of the quarters because the respondents had acquired the title through the possession of the suit against both courts of the society and it also found that the applicant had failed to prove to the applicants There is a question of cancellation or acquisition of a license. Was not created by the respondents who established that they were occupying the quarters in their own area. The lawyer for the applicant was unable to identify the misrepresentation or misuse of the facts or to record the judgment of the courts or the law. The evidence was contrary to the fact that there was no interference with the search. Editing Jurisdiction lawer from fb area from Jampur lawyer