Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI versus E.H. ELAHI ALVI

Sections 10, 11 and 30 of the Homelessness (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958 Code Vs. The rent was paid by the Settlement Authorities and PTD, the defendants issued their rights and their names were entered in the survey record as the property respondents claimed that they were the owners and the applicants. His position was prosecution. Respondents and tenants entitled to take notice under Section 30 of Act XXVIII of 1958 were not required to conduct a proper course of eviction nor was the civil suit litigation enforceable as in the case of respondents transferring an open plot Were transferred to them by settlement. Prior to the T and the premises (shops / houses) of the applicants were occupied, the transfer in favor of the respondents / applicants will be considered as tenants in respect of shops / houses under which suit against the applicants against the applicant. And keeping the houses and houses profitable on the plot in the suit was not the right decision and the trial court order was upheld. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hassan Abdal lawyer