Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ISHRAQ ALI versus S. MOINUDDIN


CLC Rule Order XPL Approves CPC Appeals from Original Decisions O XLI, R 23 Definition of Sue's Proof, Suit for Occupation and Mason's Profit Respondent acknowledges that allotment orders were shown to both parties. Such a document was not produced before the trial court. Although the original allotment order was also presented in the written statement in favor of the plaintiff, the original allotment order was not exhibited by any of the parties to prevent the cross examination in the presence of the parties' documentary evidence. The matter could hardly have been accepted. Based on the High Court and Supreme Court decisions and documentary evidence, this case, if presented, provided the parties with an opportunity to submit an original allotment order.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Thatta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.