Find a Lawyer

TUFAIL MUHAMMAD versus BURHANUDDIN

Sindh Rented Premise Ordinance 1979, while controlling for defenses of Sections 15 and 16, did not demand a report from Nazir when defending the tenant's temporary rent order but relied on the oral arguments of both lawyers. Which states that the tenant has deposited some money. The rent controller had raised some objections in relation to the adjustment but the rent controller did not make any issue as per his order, the rent controller ordered on the different dates but no rent was allowed to be adjusted. Was not appropriate Rent Controller receives remand for summary judgment on summary case held advocate for immigration from Chaghi lawyer