STALE BANK OF PAKISTAN versus AIM INTERNATIONAL
Sections 27 and 43 of the 1962 Ordinance of the Banking Companies constituted the firm respondent who acknowledges that it was neither established for the banking business nor registered as a banking company, as per the directions of this company. After the State Bank of Pakistan was suspected of doing illegal banking business, after examining the office and the firm's records, it was concluded that the firm was indeed operating an illegal banking business. A notice was issued to the firm, but the response was not satisfactory to the State Bank after complying with all legal requirements, issued and the declaration was published. The effect is that the firm was illegally banking. I am transacting. In the absence of competition by the matter firm, he was ordered to be injured as an unregistered company and accordingly appointed liquidator.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Jhatta Bhutta lawyer