Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM AIJAZ ALI & BROTHERS versus COTTON TRADING, CORPORATION

Sections 42.54 and 56 Cotton Ginning Control and Development Act (XIV of 1976), Cotton Ginning, Control and Development (Repeal) Ordinance (Section 3 of the 1976 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1907) Section 81 Appeal suit or declaration) And the permanent injunction was granted nationally to the appellants / factory for which they were entitled to compensation. The appellant alleged that the cost of the goods remained and that there was a difference between the present value and the value of the net worth which required a bank guarantee. The goods were left in a very bad condition and the government store had no value. The appellants were given another notice to pay the amount which is final and the appellants were later given another notice and the section 81, West Pakistan. Appellants filed a case for payment of the amount demanded under the Land Revenue Act, 1967, under which they took the stand that the respondents were not eligible to determine the amount which they were entitled to. Appellants allegedly could be recovered and this amount was not actually settled according to the law as the appellants were not affiliated with its commitment. I did. The court was not presented on the basis of the parties' requests and the documentary evidence, although it was decided that the respondent could not determine the present value of the factory's assets and liabilities without the opportunity to appeal to the appellants, But, moreover, the appellant failed to contest the fixed sum and if he suffered, he could not recover the Cotton Ginning Control and Development (Repeal) Act, 1977. law websites from Rajanpur lawyer