HADI DASTBAZ, SINDH CLUB versus M.V. RICE TRADER
Determination of ship damage, damaged storage, damaged goods due to defective packing and long-term liability for damages admiralty jurisdiction of Sections 3, 4 and 7 of the High Courts Ordinance 1980 The record does not show when the goods were left in Karachi for transport, the same survey or inspected goods were transported from Mozambique to Karachi and Bandar Abbas in the absence of any survey report in Karachi. It will be difficult to determine the responsibility for the damage to the goods. The defendant's survey report stated that most of the damage occurred when the vessel was in another vessel during the freight transfer process, the defendant arranged for the transport of the cargo and The tenant for the ship (other than the defendant) was appointed. Thus the amount of loss and damage to the cargo against the defendant vessel was not established
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Khushal Kot lawyer