GHULAM HUSSAIN versus KAMAL YUSUF
Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Specific Performance Agreement The appellant, who was a tenant, claimed that he paid the first installment by considering a sale in connection with the land which he allegedly owned by his landlord. Had a contract of sale which states that the shopkeeper was respondent before appellant was able to sell the land on behalf of the landlord on the basis of the power of the Attorney Court below. But found that there was a sale agreement but because the appellant failed to perform it Is over There was no reasonable agreement on liability and thus in appellant's case, the trial court added that appellant did not insist that the seller respondents had a notice of sale agreement in favor of the appellant. And that they were buyers without notice and thus the sale process could not be void and void. Trial and Decree About Trial and Decree After the decision and order of the trial in the decree, the decision of the case was confirmed by the court of appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Gakhar Mandi lawyer