Find a Lawyer

ALI ANWAR SOOMRO versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) An employee of the Utility Stores Corporation was charged with misconduct, falsifying documents. Withdrawing a certain amount of money associated with the corporation and putting it at a disadvantage, the prosecution failed to produce a witness who could say that the documents were produced by the accused, evidence of the document's expert showing that the check was signed. The accused was in the hands of the payment but did not sign the payment voucher in his hand but the fake persons were unable to comment on the change of month on the document / check mentioning who received the payment in the payment voucher. The explanation given by the accused was not likely to be prosecuted by the prosecution Taking advantage of akam I doubt the accused and acquitted the accused abused the check family advocate from Lower Dir lawyer