Find a Lawyer

ISHRAT BEGUM versus SHAZADI SULTANA

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 12 The specific performance contract for the sale of the property was agreed by the plaintiff's husband to sell the plot that he owned to the plaintiff Sadaf, under which the plaintiff signed the petition in his favor. A certain amount of money was paid to the defendants upon payment of their share. The husband and the House Building Finance Corporation were willing to pay the debt because the property was mortgaged, saying that the corporation balance amount was paid to the plaintiff's husband in favor of the plaintiff when the sub-registrar claimed to have taken possession of the property. What was After the death of the plaintiff's husband in partial performance of the contract, the plaintiff contacted the defendant to perform the sale process in full performance of the contract on payment of the balance amount, but the defendant denied that the house was his The husband owns or is the sole proprietor of the house = The defendant asserted that her husband had gifted her the property before the date of the alleged sale agreement and that the fendant seized the house in confirmation of the de-gift. And in these circumstances her husband had no right to sell the property The plaintiff also claimed that her husband's signature on the letter authority Were obtained by the statement and it appears he has found evidence that the defendant husband without disclosing the evidence he gave gifts to his wife did not lose ownership of the disputed property. That the seller and the letter authority did not sign the contract was obtained without disclosing its false statement and its contents. That the plaintiff did not acquire the property but actually paid the share payment suit to the plaintiff. online advocate from Naukot lawyer