AHMAD SAEED KIRMANI versus NATIONAL AND GRINDLAYS BANK LTD.
The CPC appearance of the Civil Procedure Code Order IX and the results of the non-submission O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Arts 164 and 181, the preceding injunction, set aside the judge in the chamber as he continued Absent and a date was set for the arguments, the appellant himself absent that day, the judge also passed an earlier order and the appellant requested to keep the order which he was referring to. The question was declined without elaborating on whether the appropriate cause was disclosed by the appellant for absenteeism. The question regarding the limitation was also discussed and no inquiry was recorded by the trial judge. The order of the trial judge was set aside and after notice to the parties, OIX, R13, CP. Under C, the case was remanded for hearing of the appellant's petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Fizagat lawyer
