WADERO MUHAMMAD TAYYAB versus AKBAR HUSSAIN
The filing of objections to arbitration on section 14 (1) and 33 awards of the Arbitration Act, 1940, the sole arbitrator presented the appellant with notice under the application under 5 14 (1) of the Arbitration Act, which was presented to the appellant's counsel and They were given time to file objections. On the date of taxation, he demanded more time to file objections which was allowed after 20 days after which the appellant filed objections. The order was exceeded by the fact that there is no arbitration agreement between the parties, there is no limit to the filing of the objections which is possible. The filing of the arbitration record within 3 years indicates that the appellant was regularly served but did not appear to be arranged by the arbitrator, the notice of the petitioner's notice on this request being ignored. Which is why he is refusing the arbitration agreement and, therefore, can file objections beyond that. Appeal dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Kotla Jam lawyer
