Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HABIB BANK LTD versus SIND LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Complaint against termination of service The Labor Court found that the employee was not a worker, was not dealt with fully and properly. And they were considered by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Such observations by the Labor Appellate Tribunal were inconsistent when it was seen in the opening line that Cleary's job was done by the employer until the date of his termination, but in the meantime the employees were "laborers." It has been concluded that the employee has been in the employ of a manager for several years. The key question from the allegations and counter-allegations was whether the employee, although nominated as a manager, was performing clerical duties when his services were terminated. The Appellate Tribunal Labor Appeal Court completely ignored and overturned its decision to approve the employee's holding of the employee as an equitable and sympathetic rather than legal consideration, without legal authority. In the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court has remanded the case to the Labor Appellate Tribunal for a new decision in accordance with law. famous high court advocate from Malakand lawyer