Find a Lawyer

SHER BAZ KHAN versus WAPDA

West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (1A) Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct), 1974, R6 (2) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Employees' legal removal appeal from this It appears that there is no dispute about the competence of the authority, which passed an order granting employees access to powers under section 17 (1A) of the Act XXXI of 1958, even in appeal. Were not questioned, therefore, the only reason available is for the judicial inquiry of the defamation order to determine whether the presence of Malad-Freed was in the use of these powers. The presence of a maltreatment stain was a sign of the fact that the employee's failure to specifically request the presence of mala fides was passed in good faith and the authority under section 17 of Act XXXI of 1958 This was not a positive charge, as a vigorous exercise of authority called for employment. The presence of mismanagement will justify the judicial examination of the case in the case of Mohammed Irshad Qureshi as per the SC RR 1986 Supreme Court rule. In the absence of any evidence, no matter of the presence or presence of Malala, an appeal was made against the order to expel the trespassers, approving the authority's termination order, against the removal order. To be removed from the merit. best advocate from Kot Addu lawyer