Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARIF GORAYA versus SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 (i) (iii) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Government employee dismisses misconduct by adopting summary procedure Such as the required production oral or documentary evidence, which was only possible in the case of a regular inquiry after the charge sheet service with the statement of allegations, was used in support of the issuance of the grievance notice to the initial inquiry committee, Finally, the government employee's dismissal from the job is proposed by the employee set up until such a preliminary inquiry. Is the refusal of the money will have to defend the inquiry in the light of the facts of the case or their interests. The expression of justice - in the light of the facts of the case, used in section 5 of the Rules of Discipline and Discipline 1973, is just a suggestion. At the outset of the proceedings, the facts that were already available could be substantiated by all the facts which were not guaranteed by law for the adoption of the summary procedure course, thus the law was not permanent in the service tribunal. According to the law, initiate new disciplinary proceedings against the public servant on the same charge and in the meantime government employees were restored to the job with immediate effect on the approval of their appeal. patent advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer