Find a Lawyer

S. ZAHID HASAN versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE

Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 (1) (b) Enforcement of promotion of promotion of NP section 21 Compensation for prevention of appeal Appeal for delay in filing appeal Appeals to Departmental Counsel regarding the Government Employee Worker Establishment Division The remedy was followed. The ministry will forward the case for public servants through the Central Board of Revenue for development, indicating that at this stage in the Establishment Division it was not thought that civil servants' appeal to the service tribunal. Delaying priority was permanently delayed. The servant was not deliberate in any way, although the question of being limited to being represented and answered by a public servant in front of the president could not be affected, thus the service tribunal urged the civil servant to act immediately. Qualified for development on. He had successfully completed the scheduled training course and was not removed from the approved list of NMIs, which his earlier suspension for the development of a public servant was the wrong amount of his AC money, which no doubt. Beyond the doubt, the mistake of correcting the amount of AC rupees stood in the way of what had happened. Name of public servant recommended for development in grade 21 service tribunal in the interest of fair play and justice; public servant should understand that from his junior history, the Central Selection Board recommended progress in grade 21. Is. Following the implementation of the orders of the service tribunal, the existing rules had to be decided by the authority on the question of seniority interc. criminal advocate from Piplan lawyer