GHULAM MOHY-UD-DIN versus THE FA. & CA.O., PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, LAHORE
The refusal to promote due to negative entries in the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Annual Secret Report was considered by the public servant for promotion but appealed to Section 4 (1) (b) of the Service Tribunals Act because of the presence of negative remarks. Compatibility rejected In 1973, it was speculated that the department had a right to take on a decision or another position, or to hold a particular position, or to take a promoted job as a high-ranking civil servant or to hold a high office. I will not lie to any appeal tribunal against the order or decision of the department authority. In addition to the fact that he dismissed his representation and terminated the possibility of the Tribunal to arrive within thirty days of the communication of the order, the appeal was disqualified and was barred.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
