MIRZA MUHAMMAD HANIF versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUES, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Section 24 of the R24 (3) and (5) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4, resulted in disciplinary proceedings from employees of a fresh inquiry service dismissing a departmental appeal to initiate a civil servant but The appeal was dismissed before the success of the service tribunal, and it was the same charges against the civil servants were resumed and they were legally removed from the job, new investigations into the same allegations legal As there was nothing wrong and the department justified passing the order after the necessary formal implementation. The report did not constitute any unlawful interference by public servants in the report in support of the allegations against the public servant, namely, participating in the election while on the job, the resignation of the Election Commission proved that Provides information about the employee's candidacy, fresh investigation against them was justified and action against him was also permissible on record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Mingora lawyer