Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL RAZZAQ versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, ZONE (B), LAHORE


Government Employees (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 5 (iii) Provision of justification for the main charge of corruption against public servants The removal of employment under public servants (competence and discipline) required proof and evidence of the competent officer. Production needed, therefore, was not justified in finding that there should not be an inquiry. The trial of a civil servant in the interest of justice was certainly not the one that attracted the summary procedure laid down in R5 (iii) of the competency and discipline rules imposed on a civil servant. I was not guaranteed it.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.