Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus THE STATE

Crimes of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 10 (3) The testimony of the accused was not presented to the husband of the prosecution to work with her husband to confirm the fact and on the other hand to testify illegally. K's father was resigned saying the prosecution's story was not reported at night even though the police station was at a distance. It was impossible to reach the police station four miles from the arrest of the two witnesses, the prosecutor and the suspect on a motorcycle. The fact that the witness was brought to the police station was not mentioned in the FIR nor prepared a recovery memo. The allegations of adultery were hardly to be believed in the laws of the mother's house, nor did the medical evidence confirm the prosecution's statement before the magistrate's inquiry was not made in accordance with the law. Failure to prove charges of felony and fornication. The remand of the case was dismissed and the conviction was stayed on the grounds that the accused was postponed and the accused acquitted. list of supreme court advocates from Shujabad lawyer