Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus STATE

Evidence for Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 16 and 10 (2) Evidence, nor was it charged with abduction under Section 16 of the Ordinance because the female co-accused was a voluntary party, nor any concrete evidence to prove it. Were present. Section 10 (2) of the said ordinance implies the presence of semen found on vaginal bushes in the meaning of adultery. The lady co-accused explained that the pregnancy was terminated by two months' material evidence and another medical examination of the lady's partner. Was done. The suspects were found to have committed themselves under the orders of the trial court, and both of them are sentenced to life in prison. property advocate from Hariwala lawyer