Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMEED ALIAS HAMEEDA versus STATE

Sections 302, 307/34 and 460 offenses against property (Law Enforcement Ordinance) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (4) inadequate evidence, definition of recovery of rifle and shotgun from the accused, for good reasons. The trial court dismissed. The footprints of the suspects were also shown with no footprints anywhere on the footprints. The FIR did not mention any of the accused's names either. It is alleged that witnesses reported lanterns at night. Neither was seen in the light of the arrest nor during the inquiry, nor did the same site plan show that the post-mortem report that was expected to be eaten at the time of the incident showed the stomach containing the digested food witnesses. The complaint filed by was allegedly located after breaking the door but did not confirm this version. Was there. An enthusiastic piece of evidence was denied the presence of version A firing on the deceased and incoming witnesses New surroundings, burns or tattoos did not appear on one of the injured witnesses The presence of the complainant looked very suspicious. Hundreds of people joined the investigation as the suspects were picked up on suspicion and the identity parade resulted in a lawsuit against the accused. Benefit from any doubt, they were benefited list of supreme court advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer