ZULQARNAIN SHAH versus STATE
Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 Article Article 4 Testimony of Evidence Confirmed by confidential information, 20 grams of heroin were recovered. No evidence from the public, though repeated requests have been submitted by the accused at shops and hotels for restoration. Investigation from some local officers present in defense of the accused during the investigation, before all the respected persons of the area and also the police, the documentary evidence presented during the investigation indicated some involvement of the local police in the cases of the accused's family. In which a small amount of heroin was added, not just two The statements of the police officers could not be relied upon and the case against the accused was not beyond doubt, under the circumstances Aketel ordered.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Ambela lawyer