Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

JONES INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE versus COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS, LAHORE


Customs Act 1969 Section 195 Pakistan Customs Tariff, Heading No. 90 14 - Following a visual inspection by Assistant Collector, the goods were assessed under Pakistan Customs Tariff No. 90 21, such case could not be reopened by Deputy Customs.
1989 M L D 1499

[Additional Secretary, Government of Pakistan Central Board of Revenue Sind]

Before G. A. Jahangir, Additional Secretary, Central Board of Revenue

Messrs JONES INTERNATIONAL, LAHORE -Petitioner

versus

COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND

LAND CUSTOMS, LAHORE -Respondents

Order in Revision No.343 Rev Customs of 1988, decided on 7th July, 1988.

(a) Customs Act (IV of 1969) -

S.195 Pakistan Customs Tariff, Heading No.90.14_ Goods after visual inspection by Assistant Collector were appraised under heading No.90.21 of the Pakistan Customs Tariff Such case could not be re opened by Deputy of Customs.

(b) Customs Act (IV of 1969)

S.32 Demand for short levy on classification Question can be raised only within six months of the payment of duty under provisions of S.32(3) of Customs Act, 1969.

Zaheer Ahmad Khan for Petitioner.

Nemo for Respondents.

ORDER

This revision application is directed against Order in Appeal No.1720 of 1986 dated 14th December, 1986 passed by the Collector of Central Excise and Customs (Appeals) Northern Zone, Lahore.

2. Mr. Zaheer Ahmad Khan, Advocate appeared for hearing on 12th December, 1987 on behalf of the applicant, Messrs Jones International and reiterated the arguments submitted by them in their revision application.

3. I have examined the record of the case and the submissions made by the applicants. The goods, after visual inspection by the Assistant Collector of Customs were appraised under heading No.90.21 of the Customs Tariff. The case therefore could not be reopened by a Deputy Collector. Demand for short levy on classification question can be raised only within six months of the payment of duty under section 32(3) of the Customs Act, 1969. I would therefore without going I into question of tariff classification of prepared coloured sides made of glass, agree with the learned counsel on the non admissibility of the demand.

4. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the revision application is admitted.

A. A./308/R

Revision admitted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Depal Pur lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.