KHALIL AHMAD versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND
The appeal against the negative remarks listed in the ACRPlaya of the Civil Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 that such remarks were recorded by the reporters after the disclosure of the facts by the accused defendants. No remarks were rejected for this period. 1979 was negative in nature and, except for observations of non-denial for years, the remaining Remarks Advisor was a civil servant in nature, which was not a case of deletion of remarks in its ACR, according to which the Supreme Court The law that was formulated as a PLD. 1986 SC 684 Appeal dismissed because of merit
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Khangah Sharif lawyer