Find a Lawyer

FARMAN ALI versus THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, KARACHI

Sindh Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 4 and 5 (3) Compulsory retirement from employment after a showcase notice, Government employee, on charges of corruption / mismanagement As an examiner for review of answer books (i) leakage of securities by obtaining real numbers corresponding to hidden numbers, (ii) evaluating responses that have been dropped or canceled. (iii) giving the maximum number of candidates on their demand, and (iv) allowing candidates to re-write their responses to blank pages, before any attempt was made and no detailed inquiry was made after marking the marks. , Neither in confirming or disputing the allegations, but through the brief R 5 (3) that the rules of competence and discipline reviewed were used to materialize on the record, though to review the answers. Enough to prove the charges, which have been dismissed or canceled, yet no other allegation has been proved. S Ltd has been awarded penalty, will not be charged a single service tribunal has reduced fines to stop development for three years from mandatory retirement, when it is due to the employee. family advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer