Find a Lawyer

REHMAT ALI versus SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MIANWALI

Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 Section 5 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Salary reduction Appellant Sub Inspector Police allegedly gave them patrols by their superior officer. In an area of violation of instructions, the appellant responded to the notice by showing that the Deputy Superintendent of Police was fully and faithfully presented in the order in which disciplinary action was taken against the appellant. A basis has been laid which proved to his supporters that he had taken the necessary precautions in light of the instructions given. In addition, the appellant, a head constable and eight constables were all on patrol. The instructions were not that every body should come out on appellant's patrol, which was to remain in the police station under the station house officer, under which the force would be deployed. Appellant had discretion. It had to take into account its natural needs very effectively and during its schedule, an institution like the Food and Rest Authority also failed to take into account the circumstances under which a separate pay order authority could be fined. Done advocate for immigration from Lala rukh lawyer