Find a Lawyer

versus

Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1975 Section 4 Punjab Police (Utilities and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R6 (3) The disciplinary action charges against the victim on record cannot be summarily dismissed. The police took action under ASI showcase notice and the charges were essentially retired. (i) Corruption and (ii) recorded misconduct in past ACRs and (iii) no prior allegations of corruption have been filed on the 3 Census awards and notice of disapproval of I1 showing ACR and still negative ACR reports. Disappointment in service tribunal records indicates challenge. The competent authority against the officer (as the appellant was already dismissed by the same officer and the appellate authority was re-inquired as to whether the inquiry was based on sketches, slipshods and assumptions) and the appellant had a There was a good service record given another 4 sensors) The same date that cannot be weighed is the same officer is offended by the appeal again to record negative remarks in the ACR official's ACR and Such remarks directed by the service tribunal should be declared baseless and result in malicious authority. Which is not going to touch any of the points presented in the official description by the official (the appellant) and which is not mentioned in the show. The defective order notice, held; the quorum was non-jurisdictional and, in the absence of a violation of the rules and regulations of the law, was positively displaying the status of the offending authority against the appellant, so the service tribunal separated it. list of advocates from Chaininda lawyer