Find a Lawyer

SAIF ULLAH versus DEPUTY COMMANDANT, PUNJAB RESERVE POLICE, FAROOQABAD

Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1975 RR 5 and 6 Service Appellant, Punjab Reserve Police Constables denied, accused of managing to replace their examination papers with fraud Sub-inspector found Consideration of unlawful endorsement from a fugitive who was convicted of a breach of trust, misuse of a public office and the recipient of an unlawful plea, was sentenced to a mere two years' imprisonment for a felony, while the said inspector Said the sub-inspector was fired from that position. The sub-inspector was of the utmost importance and being an officer had to be dealt with more strictly against the constables and there was no reduction in such a cheap case that such a bad example on one hand undermined the confidence of the subordinates and on the other hand. The result of the irregularities was to treat all the appellant's responsibilities as mild and not sub-inspector because the mitigating circumstances were on their side, but the purpose of disciplinary action was both punitive and preventable, but if the discrimination between the offenders If treated, this cannot be justified. Department officials exercise jurisdiction over disciplinary matters that are equivalent to parental jurisdiction. Everyone should be treated equally as all persons are equal before the law and it is a constitutional requirement that no discrimination be imposed. Appellants were found to have no justification in dealing with the parents who were treated, and the penalties awarded to them were judged tougher than those of the sub-inspector, given the severity of the misconduct. And their status as a jobs for fresh advocates from Hattar lawyer