Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM AKHTAR versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOOD, GUJRANWALA REGION, GUJRANWALA

Section 4 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974, which is a food collective supervisor, was fined for collection of short pie wheat prices in the warehouse on the charge that the inquiry was conducted in 1977. Was not endorsed in any written statement by the respondents in any evidence stating that the District Food Controller's issued recovery orders were withdrawn as they were due to appropriate action. Were issued without and without observing the conditions and the officer was instructed to make appropriate inquiries. God will gather the results. The authorized authority did not find anything illegal in such proceedings. The use of the word charge sheet in the showcase notice presented to the appellant did not apply because not only was the notice itself clear but the appellant also filed it on the show cause notice. And had no objection to it in the Court of Appeal. The appellant's job was that the warehouse ceilings were wandering and he was in the process of doing the same repair and since the repair was not done, there was no evidence of stock causing chaos and shortages. Appellant believes that fraud was not supplied, even denying the fact that over $ 80 worth of wheat was properly cheated appellant, which resulted in negligence in performing his duties. The government's appeal was dismissed and the loss and loss were dismissed law firms from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer