Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAKILA AKHTAR versus SECRETARY EDUCATION

Section 4 of the NWFP Service Tribunals Act 1974 suspension appellant was placed under suspension prior to mandatory retirement and his suspension was subsequently deemed to be absent from duty after a reasonable period of time, and consequently he was suspended. The benefits obtained from the employee's record were denied, indicating that the appellant substantiated his claim. Participated in payment and inquiry during the suspension period and no merger of the said period, which was considered absent for duty without reason, the suspension period was not treated as absence of duty. And the appellant was entitled to receive the charges which were acceptable to the suspended government official jobs for fresh advocates from Kamra lawyer