Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFT JAN versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1976 Section 12 (ii) The mandatory retirement waiver of the Maladies should be requested, the appellant must be retired, not only to raise the bereavement against the Retirement Authority; It failed to raise a question of bad faith in the review application submitted to the chief executive but also failed to file facts which could indicate that the retirement order was approved, the Food and Appellate Division of Food and Other officers reported widespread deficits and misappropriation of government funds. Working in this department at the relevant time failed to fulfill its responsibility of effectively controlling the officers of the department and thus avoiding the diversion of government funds, regarding the approval of the appellant's retirement order. There is no content on the appropriate authority record. To show that the Retirement Authority had mistreated the appellant and wanted to get rid of it, the beating charges, held, were unfounded in the circumstances. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dargai lawyer