Find a Lawyer

versus

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 Section 4 Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act, 1976, Section 12 (ii) The jurisdiction of the Tribunal Mala Tribunal on retirement upon completion of 25 years service was observed, or in this case There was no restriction. Acclaimed Exercise A Scope Chief Executive has raised suspicion of appellant's involvement in the misappropriation of food commodities in the Department of Food, which removed him from the position of Secretary and later by Secretary Food, the Chief Secretary and the Inspection Team. The section presented in was presented by the Food, Chief Secretary and Inspection Team, although the powers of the Appellant apparently do not appear to be clear, though the provisions of Section 12 (II) of the Civil Servants Act 1976 Retiring the appellant under, the examination of the records in the form of AC shows that, during the initial period of employment In addition to two or three entries about his slow behavior at work. The appellant was honest and a good officer, and enjoyed his reputation of good reputation and work, your affairs were appreciated by the Chief Secretaries and the Chief Executive until 1981, all his matters. Applicant's retirement on the basis of service record is not in the public interest but some external factors, based on the complaints of motivation, influence the mind of the authority in reaching a decision. Had suspected appellants' involvement in the misconduct; They should bring a charge sheet with them so that they can defend themselves if it is deemed appropriate top advocates from Vehari lawyer