STATE versus ABDUL BEHRAM
Schedule Explosives Act (VII, 1908), Sections 4, 5 and 6 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 9 of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, which includes the emptying of military ammunition The accused was found in possession of. The prosecutor, of various sizes, fitted in the Truck Ballistic Expert, testified that it could not be refilled and that their utility was no more than a piece of brass that could be melted as brass. The substance was neither intended to be used nor was the prosecution's failure to prove that the explosive substance caused the explosion to prove that they could respond to the meaning and explanation. As contained in the Schedule to Act XV of 1975, the possession of vacant lots in relation to something contained in the Explosives Act of 1908 No offense under Section 4 (2) or Section 9 of the Arms Ordinance 1965, and the accused were not guilty of the default The fence accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kacha Khooh lawyer
